Custom Search

Friday, April 30, 2010

Goldman slides on the slippery slope of irrevelance

Oh My!!!

Goldman has give Fab his performance rating!

FABRICE TOURRE--Self Evaluation week ending April 30, 2010                                                              

And the market has given Goldman it's performance rating!!

Oh My!!

And now, Goldman is already leaking "settlement." Really? Did they leak the "criminal charge" story too?

Maybe Goldman should really ask who is doing the leaking? Because they don't seem to know piss!
Wanted – People to Pee on Goldman Sachs – $20 (Financial District)
Date: 2010-03-12, 12:33PM EST
Reply to: sale-jcarv-1640787037@craigslist.org
Wait--didn't Goldman tell us this two weeks ago?
NEW YORK–(BUSINESS WIRE)–The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (NYSE: GS – News) responds to a complaint filed by the SEC today.
The SEC’s charges are completely unfounded in law and fact and we will vigorously contest them and defend the firm and its reputation.
Oh My! How did that work out? Did Goldman come up with that call from their trading huddle? $21 billion later in lost market cap--will they still vigorously defend the firm? And its storied reputation? How is that working out? Maybe they really don't have a reputation to defend!

Or how about David Viniar? Remember him, and his response to the"shitty" email in the Congressional hearings?

He makes "Slick Willie" look dull by comparison. But then, again, maybe he and Goldman have screwed more people!

What was his response to the question? Well, in all fairness,  maybe it was because he couldn't count the toilets in his house, but he said that "shitty" "depends on how you mean it" and then he said, in reply to questioning, that when, Goldman's own people said the deal was :shitty" he said "I think that was very unfortunate to have on email."

See it. Watch it. Hear it. From his own shitty mouth!


Maybe some folks from Goldman need to share a stainless shitter!

So Mr. Viniar, while you are sitting on the cold stainless seat, remember when Goldman Sachs blew up their Global Equity Opportunities Fund? Anyone remember that? Let me go over the details of this shitty deal, because this fund, was another warehouse for Goldman's dreck.


In August of 2007, this fund needed a $3 billion cash infusion, to keep it afloat. So Goldman put in $2 billion, and they got Ace Greenberg and Eli Broad to ante up to make it $3 billion.

Now let me give you a timeline in this disaster. Remember that in July of 2007, after Paulson had shorted Abacus with Goldman's help, that Paulson's fund returned 75% that month. 

Now how did Goldman's Global Equity Opportunity Fund do in July of 2007? The same month Paulson's short fund went up 75%?

Aug. 13 (Bloomberg) -- Goldman Sachs Group Inc., the most profitable securities firm and second-largest hedge-fund manager, will invest about $2 billion to shore up its Global Equity Opportunities Fund after a 28 percent decline this month.

It dropped 28%! But Goldman said it was just a failed quant strategy!And what else did Goldman say? They said, "Current values that the market is assigning to the assets underlying various funds represent a discount that is not supported by the fundamentals."

Was that just another misrepresentation by Goldman? Really?

Even though Goldman was shorting the hell out of everything they could get their hands on, even though they were rigging deals to screw banks out of money, even though they were buying protection from anyone they could, and even though they were shuffling their shit, into GEO to screw their investors.

Think about that. It was a $7 billion fund? It was leveraged 3-6X. That means you  can offload a lot of Goldman's dreck to someone else! After all, didn't they just help Paulson to do that? Does anyone ever wonder how Goldman's clients do so poorly, why Goldman does so well? Goldman's clients, are its pigeons! And lest you think otherwise, why did a Goldman spokesperson say that the market's marks were misaligned? What good is a fund to Goldman, if they can't trade against it, or offload their shit to somebody else?

Because last I looked, in 2009 Goldman did a billion in fees biz, a billion in underwriting, and $17 billion trading against their clients! But they call that just making "markets!"


And then, coincidentally, after Goldman put their cash into the fund, and only after they had made some frantic and furious phone whereby it was relayed by Ben Bernanke  to Secretary Paulson, who then filled in Goldman that a discount rate cut was coming! And then, on option expiration Friday, on August 17th, Bernanke cuts the discount rates on option expiration Friday on August 17, 2007 right before the open, and only 10 days after the Fed said this:

For immediate release

The Federal Open Market Committee decided today to keep its target for the federal funds rate at 5-1/4 percent.

Now look what Karl Denninger had to say on August 17! He was talking language even Viniar could understand!

Flipout Friday!
Amazing shit here guys.
Bernanke. You gotta love the stupidity in the markets, and you really have to have respect for just how stupid Ben Bernanke is.


Cramer had this reaction:

Six days later after the FOMC decides to leave rates alone, Goldman needs to stuff a couple billion in a fund that they have buried their dreck in, that their unwitting patsy institutions took. Then miraculously, just four days after their investment, and just 10 days after the Fed said they didn't need to cut rates, the Fed cuts.

Now when did Goldman yank the money out that they put in this fund (GEO)? The day the six month lock-up expired! Wait--Viniar told us it wasn't a rescue--it was because of the opportunities available!

Goldman reclaims most of $2bn rescue funds
By James Mackintosh in London and Ben White in New York
Published: March 26 2008 22:04 | Last updated: March 26 2008 22:04

Goldman Sachs has reclaimed 90 per cent of the $2bn it used to bail out one of its troubled hedge funds last summer as the investment bank moved to shrink the fund and avoid consolidating it on its balance sheet.

Goldman withdrew $1.8bn from its Global Equity Opportunities fund at the end of February, its first opportunity under a lock-up agreement made when it invested in August, according to people familiar with the quantitative, or computer-driven, fund. It wrote to investors last week to explain its decision but declined to comment on Wednesday.

So what does this have to do with David Viniar? Well, look at his response to questions, when he was asked about the leverage in the fund, after it lost 28% in July, just six months before Goldman yanked out their money, and rigfht after Goldman decided to "rescue" the fund, they help drown!

"No, let me just clarify. This is not a rescue. This is two things. First, given the dislocation in the markets, we believe that this is a good investment opportunity for us and the other investors that we have brought in. We also think at the same time this will be very helpful to the current fund investors because it will give the fund the wherewithal to also take advantage of these market opportunities.

"And so we think it is both of those things but not a rescue."

So it was an investment and not a rescue? Was that true? Goldman withdrew their money the very first day after the lock-up.  So let's go to the conference call, led by David Viniar, so we can get just a little better explanation:

Susan Katzke, Credit Suisse:
Okay. And just I don't know if you covered this with Roger -- I might have missed it -- but in terms of the leverage in the funds, what are the leverage parameters, and where do you expect them to be going forward? Were they in retrospect a little bit higher than you would have liked them to have been or will be going forward?

David Viniar, Goldman Sachs CFO:
They were higher than we wished they were given how fast the market moved, but they were right in line with what had been expected. And the leverage at GEO as we sit here now is around 3.5 times, which is actually a little bit under where we had told people we would operate but probably around where we will operate going forward.

Susan Katzke, Credit Suisse:
Okay. And the 3.5 times just to clarify is with the $3 billion equity investment?

David Viniar, Goldman Sachs CFO:
With the equity investment.

Susan Katzke, Credit Suisse:
Okay. So closer to 6 times before that.

David Viniar, Goldman Sachs CFO:
That is correct.

Goldman's was in such a hurry to get rid of dreck off of their balance sheet, that they shoved it into their Global Equity Opportunity Fund, and leveraged it over 6 to 1 while they were at it.

Then, Goldman had to rescue the fund, (but they said it wasn't--it was an opportunity--It was an opportunity to cover up their misdealings!) because it was over-leveraged, but only after Goldman cohorts made their phone calls to Ben Bernanke and Paulson!

And then, David Viniar, tried to misrepresent Goldman's position, by saying that the fund was just 3.5X leveraged, when in fact, before Goldman's bailout, it was 6X leveraged, and that the underwater positions, they had, were just opportunities, when Goldman in fact, was shorting the piss out of everything they could that the fund owned!

And what happened to GEO? Goldman closed it at the end of 2009. They wanted those bodies buried.

So let's do an autopsy on GEO. Because this week, we heard, that Goldman, now wants to settle with the fund, that lost money on this "shitty" deal called Timberwolf:



He lost $56 million and Goldman wants to settle? How about the billions and billions they took from the institutions in GEO?  That served as a dumping ground for Goldman's dreck?

Why don't those funds ask for an autopsy? Why don't they sue? Then they'll see the self dealing that Goldman did. Because then, Goldman hadn't completely perfected the art of front running by computerized algorithms. They did things the old fashioned way. Using Slippery Simon's methods!

When Renaissance and Simon screwed investors, you got this picture.

Because then, the astrophysicists cooked up the scheme.

But Goldman? They are more traditional.

They put a suit on!

Do an autopsy on GEO, and Mr. Smug face, David Viniar, might start using a stainless toilet, along with the other folks from Goldman, who offloaded their positions into GEO.

And then, we'll see, that he, just like the other folks from Goldman, will inexplicably suffer from memory and recollection problems!

So give him a stainless toilet.

Maybe then he will use it to think!

6 comments :

whydibuy said...

amazing the head fake the market did with gs during the hearings.
up 2 points all day long while the broad market got clocked.

It is so sinister how the market guys play games with observers. Its as if they know to do the opposite of what people expect....at least for the moment.

Anonymous said...

i ask and u deliver. Sensational!

Sam said...

Did you lose any money in GEO? ;)

Anonymous said...

that is one great story!

Anonymous said...

Like accustomed visitors, we could this sort of a ample mark or Fortunately, a mulberry individual backpack to listen to, but we rarely apperceive the achieved action of establishing a mulberry bag . Mulberry messenger bags could be implemented for all kinds of things from traveling to night have on and whichever your situation, you can't go improper that has a leather handbag! Mulberry Designers glimpse over the branded handbags and messenger bags and sort a considered to mulberry outlet happen up with their magnificent that glimpse equal toward the branded usages having said that the glimpse is unquestionably many . 1m and from 隆锚17 . The handbags are available in lots of colours that draw in almost everyone who intend to shop for it . He considered human life only tolerable abroad, and went abroad to stay at every opportunity, and at the same time he carried on a complex and improved system of agriculture in Russia, and with extreme interest followed everything and knew everything UK Mulberry Outlet Shop Bags was [url=http://www.outletmulberrybag.co.uk]mulberry outlet[/url] being done in Russia . Out of this we are able to judge how Mulberry handbags cater for consumers?taste.[/p]
[p]We are advancing our pretax predictions for the next three years from 隆锚9 . Here just make the [url=http://www.outletmulberrybag.co.uk]mulberry bag outlet[/url] leather Mulberry handbags foe example . This particular producer is merely concerning the many originator handbags which frequently trendy females could not hold on without . Many of us would like to mostly bear that enhanced pouches to Victoria Beckham's most highly charge authentic Hermes and mulberry and imitate trendy look . Just pay [url=http://www.outletmulberrybag.co.uk]mulberry bag[/url] a visit to our site and choose a bag you like . Today隆炉s statement makes clear that shorter-term selling recital is in addition a greatest optimistic factor . For the prevailing year,mulberry handbag, we are upgrading [url=http://www.outletmulberrybag.co.uk]mulberry bag uk[/url] from 隆锚13m to 隆锚15m,mulberry outlet, for 2010/11 from 隆锚18m to 隆锚20m and for 2011/12 from 隆锚22m to 隆锚30m . Series with flexible design, such as peak inclined duffel bag, tote, and mini tote and terrific proportion of hobo . The leather of Mulberry Satchel bags is of high quality, and it隆炉s quite comfortable when you touch the bag.[/p][p]Mulberry is skillful and unique in leather items . Nowadays the new cute yet sumptuous Mulberry satchel bags features bright colors, modish shape, light weight and some other merits . Today, mulberry accelerates the advance of their covering by accretion their [url=http://www.outletmulberrybag.co.uk]mulberry uk[/url] productivity, so that ample calibration of covering is not stored in the system . Fashion Mulberry Bags For You what is definitely an acclaimed all-embracing British cast which

Anonymous said...

[p]That Silver products have got a fresh in addition to lively feel, in addition to provide with regard to an array of likes in addition to situations . The attention to top quality and detail and the adore of vogue and the thrilling shifting designs served [url=http://www.saletiffanysetsonline.co.uk]tiffany outlet[/url] the manufacturer stand out from the crowd . Ready-Made Pandora Beads and Charms Neckalce-006 might be a long-lasting gift for the household and enhances types beauty having its interest obtaining charm . And these jewelries will let [url=http://www.cheapsilvertiffanyuk.co.uk]tiffany bracelet uk
[/url] you become much glamorous . Featuring spectacular capability combined with ingenuity, a Johnson Sabo label can be a new stylish substances label, which stand above the other people applying a stimulating series . So Pandora style jewelry is one of their favorites . Presently the charm's hub assortment is made up of 450 pendants you will likely have spot [url=http://www.cheapsilvertiffanyuk.co.uk]tiffany jewellery uk[/url] to use for necklaces, mobile phone handsets, earrings and bracelets . These materials are made from glass, wood, metal, silver, gold and many [url=http://www.cheapsilvertiffanyuk.co.uk]tiffany bracelet uk sale[/url] other materials.[/p][p]pandora bangle are more than just simply decorative jewelry and are often chosen with a certain theme in mind . Till now, a European jewelry set for Christmas is finished . Then, you settle [url=http://www.saletiffanysetsonline.co.uk]tiffany pendant[/url] on to implement this Thomas Sabo to go any place, Thomas Sabo Bracelet, & that i would like to put on it to go for the large trip with my accomplice & superior heart . It隆炉s clear that these categories will appeal to a lot of distinctive sorts of persons as they would [url=http://www.cheapsilvertiffanyuk.co.uk]Tiffany Bracelet[/url] appeal to a big audience . That being explained, purchasing jewelry on-line, when carried out right, also can be an incredibly rewarding, stress-free experience . They can be worn to a variety of various events be it casual or official events . This new [url=http://www.cheapsilvertiffanyuk.co.uk]cheap Tiffany Bracelet[/url] charm is a simple yet overt representation of a love for fashion.[/p]