Custom Search

Monday, March 8, 2010

Basel II

Now supposedly, the regulators are going to force the banks to have more capital. Eventually. Oh my.

Goldman's take on it was in the WSJ:

Goldman analysts recently put the cat among the pigeons by estimating what the Basel II amendments could do to capital held against credit derivatives. In a highly theoretical scenario, Goldman said Morgan Stanley might need to hold $269 billion of regulatory capital against its credit derivatives book, BofA $108 billion and J.P. Morgan $21 billion. Applying an approximation of Goldman's analysis to itself suggests the firm would need about $100 billion against its credit derivatives.

At the very least, the Goldman's analysis is a reminder that large pockets of under-capitalization may still exist. Indeed, while banks may dispute specific scenarios, they readily recognize that the Basel II changes would lead to big increases in "risk-weighted assets." This would drive up the dollar amount of capital needed, because capital requirements are set as a percentage of risk-weighted assets.

1 comment :

Sam said...

A few interest rate/credit default swaps among friends should take care of that, just like AIG did for the European banks.