Monday, November 22, 2010
Lindsey Vonn's latest cover
When she was on the cover of Sports Illustrated, the "Oh My" crowd got too excited because they thought the picture was sexist.
So what happens when she adopts the "Basic Instinct" pose?
What will the "Oh My" crowd say now?
What would Newman say?
Wait--we already know!
Netflix breaks out
But this time, the stock won't be contained by the channel; and this time, it should bust out decisively to the upside, forcing the shorts to cover, and lose their shorts-AGAIN!!
The knock on NFLX was premium content--and how would they cover that cost along with bandwidth?
Enter stage left--with Oprah touting the service. Enter stage right--NFLX increases pricing!
I think NFLX in the very short term targets 220--and that means you need to get out the stretchers! Heck check out Netflix's recommendation for those who watched Grizzly Man. It's Curious George Goes to the Hospital!!
Soon the hapless shorts--who will be visiting the Doctor with chest pains--again!
The knock on NFLX was premium content--and how would they cover that cost along with bandwidth?
Enter stage left--with Oprah touting the service. Enter stage right--NFLX increases pricing!
I think NFLX in the very short term targets 220--and that means you need to get out the stretchers! Heck check out Netflix's recommendation for those who watched Grizzly Man. It's Curious George Goes to the Hospital!!
Soon the hapless shorts--who will be visiting the Doctor with chest pains--again!
Netflix's new pricing
Oprah pimps this name, on her Favorite Things list and now NFLX increases prices.
Which just means the shorts get squeezed some more!!
Which just means the shorts get squeezed some more!!
Protect your junk from TSA radiation and eyes with Rocky Flats gear
They make radiation shielding briefs.
They also gives flying passengers a measure of privacy that is sure to piss off the pervs from the TSA!
They also gives flying passengers a measure of privacy that is sure to piss off the pervs from the TSA!
Man strips to underwear to avoid patdown, but TSA arrests him anyway because they couldn't fondle his junk
Through a statement released by his attorney Sunday night, Wolanyk said "TSA needs to see that I'm not carrying any weapons, explosives, or other prohibited substances, I refuse to have images of my naked body viewed by perfect strangers, and having been felt up for the first time by TSA the week prior (I travel frequently) I was not willing to be molested again."
Wolanyk's attorney said that TSA requested his client put his clothes on so he could be patted down properly but his client refused to put his clothes back on. He never refused a pat down, according to his attorney.
Wolanyk was arrested for refusing to complete the security process and for recording the incident on his iPhone, according to his attorney.
-----------------
He's walking through in his fr*ckin underwear for God's sake. What is wrong with the incompetent, non thinkers of the TSA? They actually now think, their job is to look at people naked, and to feel them up. To them, that's their job. It has nothing to do with making the skies safe, but to harass people in their own version of public theater!
Of course, some folks like Gloria Allred, is getting off on the groping! She said she liked being felt up!
Wolanyk's attorney said that TSA requested his client put his clothes on so he could be patted down properly but his client refused to put his clothes back on. He never refused a pat down, according to his attorney.
Wolanyk was arrested for refusing to complete the security process and for recording the incident on his iPhone, according to his attorney.
-----------------
He's walking through in his fr*ckin underwear for God's sake. What is wrong with the incompetent, non thinkers of the TSA? They actually now think, their job is to look at people naked, and to feel them up. To them, that's their job. It has nothing to do with making the skies safe, but to harass people in their own version of public theater!
Of course, some folks like Gloria Allred, is getting off on the groping! She said she liked being felt up!
Las Vegas strip revenue
I think some people (I don't know why) thought the Harrah's IPO would take some $ away from some of the gaming stocks, so LVS was pushed down, where I picked up the January 55s at $1.16. I flipped them today at $3.20, since I advertised that trade last week as a triple and you got it!! I still own the stock--that was just an option trade!
In reality, these stocks were just pushed down, because "they" needed them down, because of option expiration.
Here's strip revenue:
In reality, these stocks were just pushed down, because "they" needed them down, because of option expiration.
Here's strip revenue:
Research in Motion
So this stock was hated at 44--it's now at 58 and it is still hated. Estimates for $6 next year and $7 for 2012.
So for you haters and RIMM lovers...
rimmreport -
So for you haters and RIMM lovers...
rimmreport -
Sunday, November 21, 2010
TSA strip searches a little boy
Face it--The people at the TSA are idiots, and doing strip searches pat downs on shy little kids, is the modus operandi of pedophiles, or pedophiles in training.
The TSA is a joke. All theater, to pretend they are making the skies safe. So how is it possible, that those with the judgement, who think it is necessary to strip search a little boy, can possibly have the correct judgement in making the skies safe?
You can strip search a little boy, but you can't racially profile?
Have any white kids under six ever been used as a suicide bomb?
WTF do these jokers think?
Saturday, November 20, 2010
TSA gropers now threaten $11,000 fines for those refusing to get fondled
The Transportation Security Administration (TSA) is warning that any would-be commercial airline passenger who enters an airport checkpoint and then refuses to undergo the method of inspection designated by TSA will not be allowed to fly and also will not be permitted to simply leave the airport.
That person will have to remain on the premises to be questioned by the TSA and possibly by local law enforcement. Anyone refusing faces fines up to $11,000 and possible arrest.
Airports with the body scanners:
That person will have to remain on the premises to be questioned by the TSA and possibly by local law enforcement. Anyone refusing faces fines up to $11,000 and possible arrest.
Airports with the body scanners:
- Albuquerque International Sunport Airport
- Hartsfield-Jackson Atlanta International Airport
- Baltimore/Washington International Thurgood Marshall Airport
- Boston Logan International
- Bush Houston Interncontinental Airport
- Boise Airport
- Bradley International Airport
- Brownsville
- Buffalo Niagara International Airport
- Charlotte Douglas International
- Chicago O'Hare International
- Cincinnati/Northern Kentucky International
- Cleveland International Airport
- Corpus Christie Airport
- Dallas/Fort Worth International Airport
- Denver International Airport
- Detroit Metro Airport
- Dulles International Airport
- El Paso International Airport
- Fort Lauderdale-Hollywood International
- Fort Wayne International Airport
- Fresno Airport
- Gulfport International Airport
- Grand Rapids Airport
- Harrisburg International Airport
- Harlingen/Valley International Airport
- Honolulu International Airport
- Indianapolis International Airport
- Jacksonville International Airport
- John F. Kennedy International Airport
- Kansas City International
- LaGuardia International Airport
- Lambert/St. Louis International Airport
- Laredo International Airport
- Lihue Airport
- Los Angeles International
- Luis Munoz Marin International Airport
- McAllen Miller Airport
- McCarran International Airport
- Memphis International Airport
- Miami International Airport
- General Mitchell Milwaukee International Airport
- Mineta San José International
- Minneapolis/St.Paul International Airport
- Nashville International Airport
- Newark Liberty International Airport
- Louis Armstrong New Orleans International Airport
- Oakland International Airport
- Omaha Eppley Field Airport
- Orlando International Airport
- Palm Beach International Airport
- Philadelphia International Airport
- Phoenix International Airport
- Pittsburgh International Airport
- Port Columbus International
- Raleigh-Durham International Airport
- Richmond International Airport
- Rochester International Airport
- Ronald Reagan Washington National Airport
- Salt Lake City International Airport
- San Antonio International Airport
- San Diego International Airport
- San Francisco International Airport
- Seattle-Tacoma International Airport
- Spokane International Airport
- T.F. Green Airport
- Tampa International Airport
- Tulsa International Airport
And airports with scanners on order:
- Chicago Midway International Airport
- Houston William P. Hobby Airport
- Saipan International Airport
Banks "putback" exposure
A Potentially Big Hit
Big banks could lose $134 billion if mortgage securities are put back to them, according to Compass Point Research & Trading.
| Company/Ticker | Estimated Loss (bil) | Per Share* | % Tangible Book Value |
| Bank of America /BAC | $35.2 | $2.11 | 17% |
| JPMorgan Chase /JPM | 23.9 | 3.59 | 13 |
| Deutsche Bank /DB | 14.1 | 12.56 | 21 |
| Goldman Sachs /GS | 11.2 | 12.43 | 11 |
| RBS Greenwich /RBS | 9.4 | 0.10 | 12 |
| Credit Suisse /CS | 8.9 | 4.50 | 22 |
| UBS /UBS | 8.4 | 1.32 | 15 |
| Morgan Stanley /MS | 7.9 | 3.37 | 14 |
| Citigroup /C | 7.8 | 0.16 | 4 |
| Barclays /BCS | 3.6 | 0.18 | 3 |
| HSBC /HBC | 3.5 | 0.22 | 2 |
| Total | 133.8 | ||
| * After-tax. Sources: Compass Point Research & Trading LLC; Bloomberg; Inside MBS & ABS Asset Backed Alert | |||
Barrons:
JUST WHEN AMERICA'S MAJOR BANKS seem to be back on their feet, having paid back federal bailout money and cranked up their employee bonus programs, a new threat has emerged that could seriously affect their earnings power over the next few years.
The potential liability facing bankers arises from the $2 trillion in subprime, alt-A and option-adjustable rate mortgages that they underwrote and sold to investors, mostly as mortgage-backed securities during the home-lending boom of 2005 to 2007. The losses on the mortgages will be horrendous before the dust settles—over $700 billion on these and other so-called nonagency mortgage securities, according to New York mortgage-research specialist and broker Amherst Securities Group.
And now investors—from the federal housing giants Fannie Mae (ticker: FNMA) and Freddie Mac (FMCC) to major bond managers like closely held Pacific Investment Management and BlackRock (BLK)—are fighting back. They are seeking to put back the mortgages to the banks from whence the investment flotsam came and force the banks to eat much of the mortgage losses.
The argument hinges on the arcane contract principle of representations and warranties, known as reps and warranties in legal jargon. Namely, did the mortgages go bad because of the unanticipated nationwide collapse in home prices (a so-called exogenous factor) or are the banks responsible for the mess because they "misrepresented" to the mortgage purchasers the shoddy quality of the mortgages they put in securities and pools?
Now why is Bernanke so gung ho on QE2? Check out this in the WSJ:
Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke's $600 billion quantitative easing program has been roundly criticized in this country and around the world. So why is he doing it? Does he know something the rest of us don't?
Mr. Bernanke claimed earlier this month in a Washington Post op-ed that "higher stock prices will boost consumer wealth and help increase confidence, which can also spur spending." But, as Mr. Bernanke must know, the Japanese have been trying to influence their stock market for 20 years, with little effect on their economy. It is also unlikely, as some claim, that the Fed chairman is whipping up a stealth stimulus or orchestrating a currency devaluation. He knows these have been tried and are more likely to destroy jobs than create them.
I have a different explanation for the Fed's latest easing program: Without another $600 billion floating through the economy, Mr. Bernanke must believe that real estate (residential and commercial) would quickly drop, endangering banks..
Like it or not, banks are still weak, and another panic may be on its way. Bank of America is the best example. As of Sept. 30, its balance sheet claimed a book value (assets minus liabilities) of $230 billion. But the stock market values the company at just $118 billion. Who's right? Usually the stock market is ahead of bad news and write-offs.
--------
Of course Bernanke knows this. He wants to protect his banker's buddies bad loans.
And give the finger to the taxpayer who is covering the bill!
Friday, November 19, 2010
These guys could be shortsellers with their timing!
"The minute you turn from it, that's when it will happen!"
Oh My!!
Isn't then, that what happened?
And isn't that like the bears? Declaring victory and then--whoops!!
And today shows that the market buyers are back!
Joy to the World!
My Christmas Play!
Since Joy to the World is from Psalms 98, I'll give 98 as my target for JOYG!
Maybe I'll be able to get a Christmas gift!!
After all, look how JOYG is saying nothin' about the BUCY takeout:
The competitive landscape is about to change for the Milwaukee area’s two mining equipment manufacturers. One of them, Bucyrus International in South Milwaukee, has been busy touting a deal announced earlier this week in which the company will be bought by Caterpillar, the Peoria, Ill.-based machinery giant, in an $8.6 billion deal.
The other, Milwaukee-based Joy Global, is saying little about the deal involving its major rival.
A Joy Global spokeswoman declined to comment, saying that the company is in a “quiet period” leading up to the release of its quarterly earnings Dec. 15.
Joy Global operates the P&H Mining Equipment subsidiary, which has a large factory in West Milwaukee in the shadows of Miller Park.
With Bucyrus set to become part of a huge global company — Caterpillar had 2009 revenue of about $32.4 billion — it’s likely to become an even more formidable foe for Joy Global. Joy had fiscal 2009 sales of $3.6 billion.
The deal had an initial benefit for Joy Global shareholders as the company’s stock price shot up 7.5 percent to close at $77.77 per share on Nov. 15, the day deal the Bucyrus-Caterpillar merger was announced.
---------------
So how do you deflect that talk? How about have good earnings on December 15th, or how about selling yourself to somebody else??
Because there already is some buzz amongst workers in Milwaukee that something could be a coming!!
Because Wall Street, of course is worried that CAT's takeover will take biz away.
So sell yourself!
Since Joy to the World is from Psalms 98, I'll give 98 as my target for JOYG!
Maybe I'll be able to get a Christmas gift!!
After all, look how JOYG is saying nothin' about the BUCY takeout:
The competitive landscape is about to change for the Milwaukee area’s two mining equipment manufacturers. One of them, Bucyrus International in South Milwaukee, has been busy touting a deal announced earlier this week in which the company will be bought by Caterpillar, the Peoria, Ill.-based machinery giant, in an $8.6 billion deal.
The other, Milwaukee-based Joy Global, is saying little about the deal involving its major rival.
A Joy Global spokeswoman declined to comment, saying that the company is in a “quiet period” leading up to the release of its quarterly earnings Dec. 15.
Joy Global operates the P&H Mining Equipment subsidiary, which has a large factory in West Milwaukee in the shadows of Miller Park.
With Bucyrus set to become part of a huge global company — Caterpillar had 2009 revenue of about $32.4 billion — it’s likely to become an even more formidable foe for Joy Global. Joy had fiscal 2009 sales of $3.6 billion.
The deal had an initial benefit for Joy Global shareholders as the company’s stock price shot up 7.5 percent to close at $77.77 per share on Nov. 15, the day deal the Bucyrus-Caterpillar merger was announced.
---------------
So how do you deflect that talk? How about have good earnings on December 15th, or how about selling yourself to somebody else??
Because there already is some buzz amongst workers in Milwaukee that something could be a coming!!
Because Wall Street, of course is worried that CAT's takeover will take biz away.
So sell yourself!
Goldman's tout sheet
It looks to me like Goldman is actually tipping MTW--even though their target is just $12--they say it could be worth $19. That is if you are interested in a slower, lower priced name, that could have some upside.
GS1119 -
GS1119 -
Remember nail clippers are a national threat!
Posted by Erick Erickson
Thursday, November 18th at 6:28PM EST
A friend of mine sent me this about his TSA experience. He, unlike most of us, was coming back into the country from Afghanistan on a military charter.
——–
As the Chalk Leader for my flight home from Afghanistan, I witnessed the following:
When we were on our way back from Afghanistan, we flew out of Baghram Air Field. We went through customs at BAF, full body scanners (no groping), had all of our bags searched, the whole nine yards.
Our first stop was Shannon, Ireland to refuel. After that, we had to stop at Indianapolis, Indiana to drop off about 100 folks from the Indiana National Guard. That’s where the stupid started.
First, everyone was forced to get off the plane–even though the plane wasn’t refueling again. All 330 people got off that plane, rather than let the 100 people from the ING get off. We were filed from the plane to a holding area. No vending machines, no means of escape. Only a male/female latrine.
It’s probably important to mention that we were ALL carrying weapons. Everyone was carrying an M4 Carbine (rifle) and some, like me, were also carrying an M9 pistol. Oh, and our gunners had M-240B machine guns. Of course, the weapons weren’t loaded. And we had been cleared of all ammo well before we even got to customs at Baghram, then AGAIN at customs.
The TSA personnel at the airport seriously considered making us unload all of the baggage from the SECURE cargo hold to have it reinspected. Keep in mind, this cargo had been unpacked, inspected piece by piece by U.S. Customs officials, resealed and had bomb-sniffing dogs give it a one-hour run through. After two hours of sitting in this holding area, the TSA decided not to reinspect our Cargo–just to inspect us again: Soldiers on the way home from war, who had already been inspected, reinspected and kept in a SECURE holding area for 2 hours. Ok, whatever. So we lined up to go through security AGAIN.
This is probably another good time to remind you all that all of us were carrying actual assault rifles, and some of us were also carrying pistols.
So we’re in line, going through one at a time. One of our Soldiers had his Gerber multi-tool. TSA confiscated it. Kind of ridiculous, but it gets better. A few minutes later, a guy empties his pockets and has a pair of nail clippers. Nail clippers. TSA informs the Soldier that they’re going to confiscate his nail clippers. The conversation went something like this:
TSA Guy: You can’t take those on the plane.
Soldier: What? I’ve had them since we left country.
TSA Guy: You’re not suppose to have them.
Soldier: Why?
TSA Guy: They can be used as a weapon.
Soldier: [touches butt stock of the rifle] But this actually is a weapon. And I’m allowed to take it on.
TSA Guy: Yeah but you can’t use it to take over the plane. You don’t have bullets.
Soldier: And I can take over the plane with nail clippers?
TSA Guy: [awkward silence]
Me: Dude, just give him your damn nail clippers so we can get the f**k out of here. I’ll buy you a new set.
Soldier: [hands nail clippers to TSA guy, makes it through security]
This might be a good time to remind everyone that approximately 233 people re-boarded that plane with assault rifles, pistols, and machine guns–but nothing that could have been used as a weapon
Thursday, November 18th at 6:28PM EST
A friend of mine sent me this about his TSA experience. He, unlike most of us, was coming back into the country from Afghanistan on a military charter.
——–
As the Chalk Leader for my flight home from Afghanistan, I witnessed the following:
When we were on our way back from Afghanistan, we flew out of Baghram Air Field. We went through customs at BAF, full body scanners (no groping), had all of our bags searched, the whole nine yards.
Our first stop was Shannon, Ireland to refuel. After that, we had to stop at Indianapolis, Indiana to drop off about 100 folks from the Indiana National Guard. That’s where the stupid started.
First, everyone was forced to get off the plane–even though the plane wasn’t refueling again. All 330 people got off that plane, rather than let the 100 people from the ING get off. We were filed from the plane to a holding area. No vending machines, no means of escape. Only a male/female latrine.
It’s probably important to mention that we were ALL carrying weapons. Everyone was carrying an M4 Carbine (rifle) and some, like me, were also carrying an M9 pistol. Oh, and our gunners had M-240B machine guns. Of course, the weapons weren’t loaded. And we had been cleared of all ammo well before we even got to customs at Baghram, then AGAIN at customs.
The TSA personnel at the airport seriously considered making us unload all of the baggage from the SECURE cargo hold to have it reinspected. Keep in mind, this cargo had been unpacked, inspected piece by piece by U.S. Customs officials, resealed and had bomb-sniffing dogs give it a one-hour run through. After two hours of sitting in this holding area, the TSA decided not to reinspect our Cargo–just to inspect us again: Soldiers on the way home from war, who had already been inspected, reinspected and kept in a SECURE holding area for 2 hours. Ok, whatever. So we lined up to go through security AGAIN.
This is probably another good time to remind you all that all of us were carrying actual assault rifles, and some of us were also carrying pistols.
So we’re in line, going through one at a time. One of our Soldiers had his Gerber multi-tool. TSA confiscated it. Kind of ridiculous, but it gets better. A few minutes later, a guy empties his pockets and has a pair of nail clippers. Nail clippers. TSA informs the Soldier that they’re going to confiscate his nail clippers. The conversation went something like this:
TSA Guy: You can’t take those on the plane.
Soldier: What? I’ve had them since we left country.
TSA Guy: You’re not suppose to have them.
Soldier: Why?
TSA Guy: They can be used as a weapon.
Soldier: [touches butt stock of the rifle] But this actually is a weapon. And I’m allowed to take it on.
TSA Guy: Yeah but you can’t use it to take over the plane. You don’t have bullets.
Soldier: And I can take over the plane with nail clippers?
TSA Guy: [awkward silence]
Me: Dude, just give him your damn nail clippers so we can get the f**k out of here. I’ll buy you a new set.
Soldier: [hands nail clippers to TSA guy, makes it through security]
This might be a good time to remind everyone that approximately 233 people re-boarded that plane with assault rifles, pistols, and machine guns–but nothing that could have been used as a weapon
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
























