Tuesday, June 21, 2011

Judge rules upgrades/downgrades are not "proprietary" information

A federal appeals court ruled on Monday that investment banks could not stop a financial Web site from immediately publishing the research recommendations of their stock analysts, delivering a blow to Wall Street and a win for the investing public.

Perhaps more significant, the decision was a victory for Internet companies whose business models depend upon summarizing and commenting on others’ original content. Yet media businesses also cheered the ruling because it left in place legal protections against rogue competitors who copy and resell original news reporting at little or no cost.

“It’s a great decision for the free flow of information in the new media age,” said Kathleen M. Sullivan, a lawyer who filed a brief in the case on behalf of two clients, Google and Twitter.

In a lawsuit closely followed by the world’s largest financial, media and technology businesses, a panel of three judges on the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit in Manhattan ruled that Barclays, Morgan Stanley and Bank of America could not dictate who reported news about their stock research — nor when they reported it.


Anonymous said...

Wondering fo you have any of the recent reports from FBR Capital on MG?. I have been looking everywhere.


Anonymous said...

MGM not MG

chenlina said...

thunder jerseys
pandora charms
clarks shoes
toms outlet
ralph lauren outlet
longchamp pas cher
christian louboutin uk
retro jordans
hermes belt
polo ralph lauren outlet