This tragedy provides an argument against NRA gun-lover types doesn't it? I mean, soldiers are the most heavily armed group of all and it sure didn't help them here (unless you consider a 12 to 1 kill ratio to be acceptable).
I mean if soldiers (who are the most heavily-armed group of all) are vulnerable to this kind of event, then what good would it do to [further] arm the general public?
This tragedy provides an argument against NRA gun-lover types doesn't it? I mean, soldiers are the most heavily armed group of all and it sure didn't help them here (unless you consider a 12 to 1 kill ratio to be acceptable).
ReplyDeleteA better way to phrase my last post:
ReplyDeleteI mean if soldiers (who are the most heavily-armed group of all) are vulnerable to this kind of event, then what good would it do to [further] arm the general public?